Skip to main content

Leafield Retirement Plan (PO-11450)

Complainant: Mrs S
Complaint Topic: Transfers: general
Ref: PO-11450
Outcome: Upheld
Respondent: Fast Pensions Limited
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Mrs S’ complaint is upheld and to put matters right Fast Pensions should provide a full written response to Mrs S’s questions regarding the status and security of the Plan.  They should also clarify her right to access her pensions fund and any penalties that apply, and assist her in exercising her statutory right to a transfer if she so wishes.  Fast Pensions should also pay Mrs S £1,000, to reflect the significant distress and inconvenience caused to her by their maladministration.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mrs S complains that Fast Pensions failed to respond to her enquiries about the status and security of the Plan, and provide her with the information she requires to determine if she can access her pension fund at age 55 under the new pension freedoms, or transfer her pension fund to a different provider.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • (CAS-67622-R2B2)
    Complainant: Mr H
    Respondent: Trustee of the Aegon UK Staff Retirement and Death Benefit Scheme
    Mercer Limited
    Scottish Widows Platform, trading as Embark Investment Services limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Transfers: general
    Ref: CAS-67622-R2B2
    Date:
  • Smiths Industries Pension Scheme (CAS-90329-R7N2)
    Complainant: Mr E
    Respondent: Smiths Industries Pension Trustees Limited
    Mercer Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Transfers: general
    Ref: CAS-90329-R7N2
    Date: