We use some essential cookies to make this website work.

We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use our website, remember your settings and improve our services.

Before deciding you can read more about our cookies.

Smart Pensions (CAS-109231-Q6Q9)

Complainant: Miss S
Complaint Topic: Contributions: failure to pay into scheme
Ref: CAS-109231-Q6Q9
Outcome: Upheld
Respondent: Mr M G T/A Confidentials.com
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Appeal: No

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

Miss S’ complaint is upheld and, to put matters right, the Employer shall pay £3,000.06 into the Scheme. The Employer shall ensure that Miss S is not financially disadvantaged by its maladministration. So, it shall arrange for any investment loss to be calculated and paid into the Scheme. 

In addition, the Employer shall pay Miss S £500 for the significant distress and inconvenience it has caused her.

Complaint summary

Miss S has complained that the Employer, despite deducting contributions from her pay, has failed to pay them into the Scheme. 

Miss S has said that the missing contributions amounted to £3,000.06. This figure represents £1,875.06 in employee contributions and £1,125 in employer contributions.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • True Potential Investments Pension Scheme (CAS-116602-S0V9)
    Complainant: Ms N
    Respondent: Mr Peter E O’Hare
    Outcome: Upheld
    Complaint Topic: Contributions: failure to pay into scheme
    Ref: CAS-116602-S0V9
    Date:
  • NEST (CAS-101562-B0Y7)
    Complainant: Mr L
    Respondent: Premier Group Recycling Ltd
    Outcome: Upheld
    Complaint Topic: Contributions: failure to pay into scheme
    Ref: CAS-101562-B0Y7
    Date:
View all decisions