Rettig UK Pension Scheme (PO-19073)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Complaint Summary
Mr A has complained that when a pension sharing order on divorce was made against him, KPMG transferred too much money from the Scheme to the pension arrangement of Mrs A, his ex-wife.
Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons
The complaint should be upheld against KPMG because it transferred too much money from the Scheme to Mrs A’s pension arrangement, causing Mr A financial loss. In addition, he incurred legal costs that would not otherwise have been incurred, and should be compensated for those costs. Lastly, an award should be made to Mr A for the significant distress and inconvenience that KPMG has caused him.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- LifeSight Master Trust (CAS-54811-N0H7)Complainant: Mr XRespondent: Trustee of the LifeSight Master Trust,
Willis Towers WatsonOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-54811-N0H7Date: - Lindab Limited Group Stakeholder Pension Plan (CAS-82642-K3R2)Complainant: Mrs YRespondent: Royal LondonOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-82642-K3R2Date: