Imperial Home Decor Pension Scheme (PPFO-19038)
Complainant: Mr N
Complaint Topic: Other
Ref: PPFO-19038
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: Pension Protection Fund
Type: Financial Assistance Scheme appeal
Date:
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr N’s appeal and no further action is required by the PPF.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr N has appealed the decision of the Board of the PPF (the Board) to reduce his Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) benefits going forward. He also does not believe that his asset share was correctly calculated by FAS and that some elements of his pension benefits were omitted from the calculation.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)Complainant: Ms Y, Mr S, Mr E, Mr Y, Mr GRespondent: Brambles Administration Limited (Brambles)
Mr Simon Hamilton Kaigh
Mr Michael McNally
Eleven Property Limited (Eleven Property)
SHK Property Services Limited (SHK Property Services)
Gilbert Trading Limited (Gilbert Trading)Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5Date: - Liverpool Victoria (LV=) SIPP (CAS-50479-K7G0)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: LV=Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-50479-K7G0Date: