The Pension Protection Fund (PPFO-12943)
Complainant: Mr N
Complaint Topic: Other
Ref: PPFO-12943
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: The Board of the Pension Protection Fund
Type: Pensions Protection Fund referral
Date:
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr N’s referral and no further action is required by the Board.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Summary of application and background
Application Summary
The PPF Ombudsman has received a reference of a reviewable matter following a decision by the Board’s Reconsideration Committee dated 24 February 2017. The referral concerns Mr N’s entitlement to enhanced early retirement benefits.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)Complainant: Ms Y, Mr S, Mr E, Mr Y, Mr GRespondent: Brambles Administration Limited (Brambles)
Mr Simon Hamilton Kaigh
Mr Michael McNally
Eleven Property Limited (Eleven Property)
SHK Property Services Limited (SHK Property Services)
Gilbert Trading Limited (Gilbert Trading)Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5Date: - Liverpool Victoria (LV=) SIPP (CAS-50479-K7G0)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: LV=Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-50479-K7G0Date: