Police Pension Scheme (PO-7096)
2. Capita
Complaint summary
Mr Cherry’s complaint against the Commissioner and Capita relates to their failure to inform him of the tax penalties on his retirement benefits when taking subsequent re-employment.
Summary of the Ombudsman’s Determination and reasons
The complaint should be upheld against the Commissioner because it had a duty of care, as Mr Cherry’s employer, to have informed him of the tax implications of re -employment on his retirement benefits. Its failure to do so has led to Mr Cherry incurring tax charges on his retirement benefits.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- ThyssenKrupp UK Plc 2006 Retirement and Death Benefits Plan (CAS-52078-W0C1)Complainant: Mr NRespondent: Thyssenkrupp UK 2006 Pension Trustees Limited
Mercer Limited
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: CAS-52078-W0C1Date: - NHS Pension Scheme (CAS-56273-M4B2)Complainant: Mr SRespondent: NHS Business Services AuthorityOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Failure to provide information/act on instructionsRef: CAS-56273-M4B2Date: