Hornbuckle Mitchell SIPP (PO-2254)
Subject
Mr and Mrs Johnson’s complaint against HM follows a failure to pay taxes on a plot of land (the land) in the United States, which formed part of their SIPP investments which resulted in the land being repossessed by the regional authority in Florida and then sold. Mr and Mrs Johnson complain that the compensation offered by HM is inadequate and that HM could have taken steps to prevent the land from being sold on.
The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons
The complaint should be upheld against HM. This is because they have not offered Mr and Mrs Johnson appropriate compensation for the loss to their SIPP resulting from their admitted failure to pay the taxes on the land, which led to the land being repossessed and sold.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- CSC Computer Sciences Limited Pension Scheme (CAS-61854-F9L4)Complainant: Ms YRespondent: DXC Pension Trustee Limited (the Trustee)
DXC (the Company)
Mercer
Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-61854-F9L4Date: - The Aviva Self Invested Personal Pension Plan and the Aviva Commercial Property Investment provided by Curtis Banks (CAS-51876-F7Y0)Complainant: Mr TRespondent: Suffolk Life Annuities trading as Curtis BanksOutcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-51876-F7Y0Date: