Curtis Banks SIPP (PO-26512)
Complainant: Mr E
Complaint Topic: Other
Ref: PO-26512
Outcome: Partly upheld
Appeal outcome: None
Respondent: Curtis Banks
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Appeal: No
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr E’s complaint against Curtis Banks is partly upheld. To put matters right, Curtis Banks shall follow the directions set out in paragraphs 40 and 41 below.
Complaint summary
Mr E complains that Curtis Banks delayed his in specie transfer and he is unhappy with the service he received during that time. He argues that there were delays with the following:
· issuing documentation;
· contacting him about an outstanding invoice;
· responding to his correspondence; and
· processing a VAT reclaim.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)Complainant: Ms Y, Mr S, Mr E, Mr Y, Mr GRespondent: Brambles Administration Limited (Brambles)
Mr Simon Hamilton Kaigh
Mr Michael McNally
Eleven Property Limited (Eleven Property)
SHK Property Services Limited (SHK Property Services)
Gilbert Trading Limited (Gilbert Trading)Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5Date: - Liverpool Victoria (LV=) SIPP (CAS-50479-K7G0)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: LV=Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-50479-K7G0Date: