Skip to main content

The Pension Protection Fund (CAS-81612-D7R6)

Complainant: Mr Y
Complaint Topic: Interpretation of scheme rules/policy terms
Ref: CAS-81612-D7R6
Outcome: Not upheld
Appeal outcome: None
Respondent: The Board of the Pension Protection Fund
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Appeal: No

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint and no further action is required by the Board.  

Complaint summary

Mr Y’s complaint is that the Board failed to consider section 9931 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) when it did not object to the Halcrow Regulated Apportionment Agreement (the RAA) that was put in place in respect of the Halcrow Pension Scheme (the Scheme).  

Mr Y considers he has suffered injustice arising from the Board’s maladministration because, as a result of the Scheme’s transfer to the PPF, the inflationary increases on his PPF compensation in respect of his post-1997 service are capped at a lower rate. He also does not receive inflationary increases on his PPF compensation in respect of his pre-1997 service.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • Universities Superannuation Scheme (CAS-53519-W5N0)
    Complainant: Mrs N
    Respondent: Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd
    Outcome: Partly upheld
    Complaint Topic: Interpretation of scheme rules/policy terms
    Ref: CAS-53519-W5N0
    Date:
  • DHL Group Retirement Plan (CAS-80781-Z8X0)
    Complainant: Mr D
    Respondent: DHL Pensions
    DHL Trustees Limited
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Interpretation of scheme rules/policy terms
    Ref: CAS-80781-Z8X0
    Date: