Skip to main content
Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Subject

Mrs Jenkins’ complaint which is against DoH and McKesson, as employer and administrator of the Scheme, respectively, is that they failed to advise her that an estimate of her retirement benefits which was given to her in September 2011 was incorrect.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (PO-2770)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Subject

Captain N complains that MNOPF Trustees Ltd (the Trustees) supplied him with an incorrect early retirement quotation in October 2011 showing considerably overstated benefits as at 6 April 2013 which he relied upon to his financial detriment.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

EMI Group Pension Fund (PO-5023)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Subject

Dr Levinson has complained about the change to the method and late retirement factors used to calculate his late retirement pension and that he was not informed of the change before or after it occurred.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

EMI Group Pension Fund (PO-5018)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Date:

Subject

Mr Atkinson has complained about the change to the method and the late retirement factors used to calculate his late retirement pension and that he was not informed of the change before or after it occurred.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Standard Life Self Invested Personal Pension Scheme (PO-3105)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Subject

Mr Stobie complains that Standard Life refused to act on his request to transfer his benefits from the SIPP to the Shredded Image Limited Pension Scheme (the Scheme).

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Scottish Widows Retirement Annuity Contract (PO-2704)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Subject

Mrs Bashford, as the legal personal representative of her late husband, has complained that she has not been properly compensated for the tax charges that arose on the death benefit payable in respect of her late husband’s personal pension. Furthermore the tax charges had only arisen as a result of the procedures that Scottish Widows had followed in settling the payment.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PO-3983)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Subject

  • Dr Blackshaw has complained that she and her husband were misled as to her entitlement to a widow’s pension under the Scheme. She says that she has suffered significant financial loss in her pension provision as a result of decisions taken in reliance of the incorrect information they were given.

The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons

The complaint should be partially upheld against the Cabinet Office because:

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Hornbuckle Mitchell Personal Pension Plan (PO-4322)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Complaint summary

Mr Atkinson complains that Hornbuckle Mitchell Group Ltd (HMGL) failed to complete a transfer of funds between two US dollar (USD) bank accounts held in the SIPP on a timely basis. He says that he has suffered a considerable financial loss as a consequence of the delay because he could not use these funds to purchase US stocks at the end of December 2013.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Marks and Spencer Pension Scheme (PO-4443)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Complaint summary

Miss O’Riordan complains that the Trustee provided incorrect information about the application of the state pension deduction (the Deduction) to her pension entitlement. She says that the dispute centres on the difference between ‘payment provision’ in the rules of the Scheme and ‘Benefit Calculation Provisions’.  She feels that because she was already receiving a pension, the Trustee cannot recalculate the benefit and introduce a new reduction.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Partly upheld