Namulas SIPP (formerly the Self Invested Personal Harvester Pension Scheme)
(PO-8386)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr S’s complaint against LV= is partly upheld, but there is a part of the complaint I do not agree with. To put matters right for the part that is upheld, LV= should arrange to pay Mr S £500 compensation in recognition of the distress and inconvenience caused to him by the maladministration identified.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr S contends that the administration charges which the current SIPP administrator LV= has levied are unfair because: