Leafield Retirement Plan (PO-12296)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr H’s complaint is upheld, and to put matters right Fast Pensions should respond to Mr H’s queries about the payment of his pension funds. Fast Pensions should also pay Mr H £1,000, to reflect the significant distress and inconvenience caused to him by its maladministration.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr H complains that Fast Pensions has failed to respond to his request to pay his pension benefits.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- (CAS-67622-R2B2)Complainant: Mr HRespondent: Trustee of the Aegon UK Staff Retirement and Death Benefit Scheme
Mercer Limited
Scottish Widows Platform, trading as Embark Investment Services limited
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-67622-R2B2Date: - Smiths Industries Pension Scheme (CAS-90329-R7N2)Complainant: Mr ERespondent: Smiths Industries Pension Trustees Limited
Mercer Limited
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Transfers: generalRef: CAS-90329-R7N2Date: