Skip to main content

Santander Retirement Plan (PO-12995)

Complainant: Mr Y
Complaint Topic: Misquote/misinformation
Ref: PO-12995
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: 1. JLT Employee Benefits (JLT)
2. Santander (UK) Group Pension Scheme Trustees Limited (the Trustees)
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint and no further action is required by JLT or the Trustees.

My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.

Complaint summary

Mr Y has complained that:

  • prior to leaving Santander Bank in 2015, he was “advised” by JLT (the Plan Administrators), that he could remain in the Plan indefinitely. Mr Y believed a verbal contract was entered into meaning he could remain in the Santander Global Equity Fund, which is only available under the Plan;
  • he has received a poor level of customer service. JLT offered Mr Y £100 for the distress and inconvenience caused which has been declined;
  • if the Trustees refuse his request to remain in the Plan, then he wants the Trustees to pay for financial advice to obtain a recommendation for a suitable replacement pension policy; and
  • if the charges are likely to be higher on any new pension policy he wants to be compensated for the difference over the full term of the Plan.

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • Fee Paid Judicial Pension Scheme (CAS-45233-Y4G1)
    Complainant: Mr T
    Respondent: Ministry of Justice
    XPS Pensions Consulting Limited
    Outcome: Upheld
    Complaint Topic: Misquote/misinformation
    Ref: CAS-45233-Y4G1
    Date:
  • Firemen’s Pension Scheme 1992 (CAS-84082-Y3B5)
    Complainant: Mr R
    Respondent: South Wales Fire & Rescue Authority
    Rhondda Cynon Taff County Borough Council
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Misquote/misinformation
    Ref: CAS-84082-Y3B5
    Date: