Brett Packman Pension Scheme (CAS-45393-C2H6)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mrs T’s complaint is partly upheld but no further action is required by Rowanmoor.
Complaint summary
Mrs T has complained that Rowanmoor, the administrator of the Scheme, incorrectly informed her husband on 20 September 2019 by telephone that an income drawdown payment of £669,725.15 available to her from the Scheme would be subject to income tax at 20% instead of her marginal rate of tax.
Mrs T has said that:-
· If Rowanmoor had told her husband, Mr T, that tax would be deducted from the payment in accordance with her tax code supplied by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), she would have decided not to take it.
· She has paid unexpected additional income tax of around £150,000, which she cannot reclaim from HMRC.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Apek Design Pension Scheme (CAS-30534-X6G1)Complainant: Mr ERespondent: Mr Eric HillOutcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-30534-X6G1Date:
- Local Government Pension Scheme - East Sussex Pension Fund (CAS-56106-J4K1)Complainant: Mrs SRespondent: Swale Academies Trust
East Sussex County Council Pension Services
East Sussex County Council Human Resources DepartmentOutcome: Partly upheldComplaint Topic: AdministrationRef: CAS-56106-J4K1Date: