The Ryland Group Pension Scheme (CAS-31053-J5J5)
Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Other
Ref: CAS-31053-J5J5
Outcome: Upheld
Appeal outcome: None
Respondent: Prudential
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Appeal: No
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
The complaint is upheld against Prudential because:
· it provided Mr S with incorrect information; and
· this situation has caused Mr S distress and inconvenience.
Complaint summary
Mr S’ complaint concerns the error Prudential made in 2014, in transferring his pension that was subject to a Pension Sharing Order (PSO) in favour of his ex-wife, to his pension with Rowanmoor (the SSAS).
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)Complainant: Ms Y, Mr S, Mr E, Mr Y, Mr GRespondent: Brambles Administration Limited (Brambles)
Mr Simon Hamilton Kaigh
Mr Michael McNally
Eleven Property Limited (Eleven Property)
SHK Property Services Limited (SHK Property Services)
Gilbert Trading Limited (Gilbert Trading)Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5Date: - Liverpool Victoria (LV=) SIPP (CAS-50479-K7G0)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: LV=Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-50479-K7G0Date: