We use some essential cookies to make this website work.

We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use our website, remember your settings and improve our services.

Before deciding you can read more about our cookies.

The Pension Protection Fund (CAS-98051-N8F9)

Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Winding up
Ref: CAS-98051-N8F9
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: The Board of the Pension Protection Fund
Type: Pensions Protection Fund complaint
Date:
Appeal: No

Ombudsman’s Determination

Outcome

I do not uphold Mr S’ complaint of maladministration and no further action is required by the Board. 

Complaint summary

Mr S has complained of maladministration on the part of the PPF, in that he was not made aware of the implications of the Artenius Pension Scheme (the Scheme) entering the PPF when he decided to take his pension benefits early in 2009. Mr S says the PPF was at fault as it withheld information in order to financially benefit. 

View determination

Download

Related decisions

  • Sotheby's Pension Scheme (CAS-93708-Q1W7)
    Complainant: Mr Y
    Respondent: Trustees of the Sotheby's Pension Scheme
    Sotheby's
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Winding up
    Ref: CAS-93708-Q1W7
    Date:
  • Sotheby's Pension Scheme (CAS-86492-T9Z3)
    Complainant: Mr N
    Respondent: Trustees of the Sotheby's Pension Scheme (the Trustees)
    Sotheby's (the Employer)
    Outcome: Not upheld
    Complaint Topic: Winding up
    Ref: CAS-86492-T9Z3
    Date:
View all decisions