Santander Retirement Plan (PO-12995)
Complainant: Mr Y
Complaint Topic: Misquote/misinformation
Ref: PO-12995
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: 1. JLT Employee Benefits (JLT)
2. Santander (UK) Group Pension Scheme Trustees Limited (the Trustees)
2. Santander (UK) Group Pension Scheme Trustees Limited (the Trustees)
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint and no further action is required by JLT or the Trustees.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr Y has complained that:
- prior to leaving Santander Bank in 2015, he was “advised” by JLT (the Plan Administrators), that he could remain in the Plan indefinitely. Mr Y believed a verbal contract was entered into meaning he could remain in the Santander Global Equity Fund, which is only available under the Plan;
- he has received a poor level of customer service. JLT offered Mr Y £100 for the distress and inconvenience caused which has been declined;
- if the Trustees refuse his request to remain in the Plan, then he wants the Trustees to pay for financial advice to obtain a recommendation for a suitable replacement pension policy; and
- if the charges are likely to be higher on any new pension policy he wants to be compensated for the difference over the full term of the Plan.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Fee Paid Judicial Pension Scheme (CAS-45233-Y4G1)Complainant: Mr TRespondent: Ministry of Justice
XPS Pensions Consulting Limited
Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: Misquote/misinformationRef: CAS-45233-Y4G1Date: - Firemen’s Pension Scheme 1992 (CAS-84082-Y3B5)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: South Wales Fire & Rescue Authority
Rhondda Cynon Taff County Borough Council
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: Misquote/misinformationRef: CAS-84082-Y3B5Date: