The Ryland Group Pension Scheme (CAS-31053-J5J5)
Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Other
Ref: CAS-31053-J5J5
Outcome: Upheld
Appeal outcome: None
Respondent: Prudential
Type: Pension complaint or dispute
Date:
Appeal: No
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
The complaint is upheld against Prudential because:
· it provided Mr S with incorrect information; and
· this situation has caused Mr S distress and inconvenience.
Complaint summary
Mr S’ complaint concerns the error Prudential made in 2014, in transferring his pension that was subject to a Pension Sharing Order (PSO) in favour of his ex-wife, to his pension with Rowanmoor (the SSAS).
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Liverpool Victoria (LV=) SIPP (CAS-50479-K7G0)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: LV=Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-50479-K7G0Date:
- Fidelity Master Trust - Sytner Group Retirement Plan Section (CAS-30342-Z1B0)Complainant: Mr SRespondent: Fidelity International (Fidelity)
ZEDRA Governance Limited (ZEDRA)
Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-30342-Z1B0Date: