Financial Assistance Scheme (PPFO-19624)
Complainant: Mr S
Complaint Topic: Other
Ref: PPFO-19624
Outcome: Not upheld
Respondent: Pension Protection Fund
Type: Pensions Protection Fund referral
Date:
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Mr S’ appeal and no further action is required by PPF.
My reasons for reaching this decision are explained in more detail below.
Complaint summary
Mr S has appealed the decision of the Board of the PPF (the Board) to reduce the pension he had been in receipt of for 15 years.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
- Eleven Property Pension Scheme, SHK Property Services Pension, Gilbert Trading Pension Scheme (CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5)Complainant: Ms Y, Mr S, Mr E, Mr Y, Mr GRespondent: Brambles Administration Limited (Brambles)
Mr Simon Hamilton Kaigh
Mr Michael McNally
Eleven Property Limited (Eleven Property)
SHK Property Services Limited (SHK Property Services)
Gilbert Trading Limited (Gilbert Trading)Outcome: UpheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-56320-R9K9, CAS-29144-G2B0, CAS-64379-Y9G6, CAS-82685-J8S7, CAS-84074-G0W5Date: - Liverpool Victoria (LV=) SIPP (CAS-50479-K7G0)Complainant: Mr RRespondent: LV=Outcome: Not upheldComplaint Topic: OtherRef: CAS-50479-K7G0Date: