Skip to main content

Civil Service Injury Benefits Scheme (84612/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:
Appeal:

Mrs Bloomer’s complaint is that CSP (who administer the Scheme for Mrs Bloomer’s former employer, Ministry of Defence) and SME (the Scheme managers) did not properly c …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Armed Forces Pension Scheme (85193/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Davie has complained that he has not been awarded a retrospective invaliding pension. It is his view that the injury he received in 1977 should have resulted in him being invalided out of the Navy. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not be upheld against the Royal …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Police Pension Scheme (83787/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Ashcroft disagrees with the decision of South Wales Police Force and South Wales Police Authority to reduce his injury benefit entitlement from Band 4. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not be upheld against South Wales Police Authority o …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Police Pension Scheme (85174/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Bloxham is dissatisfied because the South Wales Police and South Wales Police Authority, and Police Medical Appeals Board have reduced his benefits from Band 3 to Band 1. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not upheld against the respondent …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Local Government Pension Scheme (84020/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mrs A has complained that the Council failed to properly assess her entitlement to a permanent injury allowance, took too long to process her claim, and awarded her a token amount, which they refuse to backdate to the date her employment ceased. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and sho …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

The Police Injury Benefit Scheme (78403/4)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Doughty complains that the MPA, his previous employer unfairly reduced his injury benefit in 2007 and that following his appeal the MPA refused to refer his case back to the Police Medical Appeal Board ( PMAB) under Regulation 32(2) The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

NHS Injury Benefit Scheme (87140/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mrs King disagrees with the decision not to award her a permanent injury benefit (PIB) The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not be upheld against the NHS Pensions because they have reached their decision in a proper manner. DETAILED DETERMINATION REGULATIONS Regulation 3(2) o …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Police Injury Benefit Scheme (87657/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Marsden asserts that the review of his injury benefit undertaken in 2008/09 was not conducted in accordance with the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against Nottinghamshire Police Authority b …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

NHS Injury Benefit Scheme (87200/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr Ring disagrees with the decision of NHSBSA not to award him Permanent Injury Benefits (PIB) from the Scheme. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against NHSBSA because they have not properly considered whether Mr Ring has incurred a Perm …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Police Injury Benefit Scheme (83467/1)

Complainant:
Complaint Topic:
Ref:
Outcome:
Respondent:
Type:
Date:

Mr A complains that the MPA, his previous employer unfairly reduced his injury benefit in December 2007 and that following his appeal the MPA refused to refer his case back to the Police Medical Appeal Board (PMAB) under Regulation 32(2) The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reaso …

View determination

Download

Related decisions

Subscribe to Injury benefit