Mrs Hanna disagrees with the decision made by CSP not to award her a temporary injury benefit from the Scheme. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short …

Mr Whitehurst asserts that the review of his injury benefit undertaken in 2006 was not conducted in accordance with the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against Nottinghamshire Police Auth …

Mr Ayling disagrees with the decision not to award him a Service Attributable Pension (SAP) The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not be upheld against the SPVA because the decision was properly reached. DETAILED DETERMI …

Essentially, Mr Young’s complaint is that he disagrees with NHSBSA’s decision that he has not suffered any permanent loss of earning ability (PLOEA) and so is not entitled to payment of a Permanent Injury Benefit (PIB) The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint sh …

Miss Clarke complains UCLan should have granted her an injury allowance first in respect of an accident at work in 1986 and second in respect of injuries sustained in 1994. In addition, she says that UCLan failed to refer her appeal in 2008-09 to the Secretary of State. The Pensions Ombud …

Mr Douglas complains that Greater Manchester Police has not acted in accordance with the regulations in relation to the review of his injury pension The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against Greater Manchester Police because the decision to reduce Mr Dougl …

Mr Jayes’ complaint is that his injury benefit has been incorrectly reduced from Band 3 to Band 1. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against NPA who concede that the 2007 and 2008 reviews were not carried out in accordance with the Po …

Ms Beale complains that the MPA, her previous employer, unfairly reduced her injury benefit in December 2007. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against MPA because both it and the PMAB misunderstood the scope of the review of …

Mrs Baker complains that NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) the manager of the Scheme, has wrongly declined her application for permanent injury benefits (PIB) She also complains that NHSBSA has allegedly: failed to follow the correct procedure in initiating Stage Two of the Scheme’s I …

Mr Bidgood complains: about the way in which Sussex dealt with the review of his injury benefit in 2010, and that Sussex refused, in November 2011, to allow him to make an appeal under Regulation 32(2) about the decision made at the review of his injury benefit in 2002. The Pensions Ombudsman’s det …